Go Back   Home Talk Entertainment Forums > Home Talk > bUrst

bUrst Mild political topics and debate.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-20-2012, 01:23 AM   #1
Calamity Jane
Topaz Member
 
Calamity Jane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,247
Default Here's a thought.....

makes sense to me!

Calamity Jane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2012, 07:03 AM   #2
boulderbelt
Gold Member
 
boulderbelt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: West Central Ohio
Posts: 605
Default

Hmmm, sounds like a plan. But contributing to super PACS is a whole lot more sexy than creating jobs, apparently.
boulderbelt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2012, 07:15 AM   #3
Marina
Elite Presidential Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 15,648
Default

They must donate more money to their pacs than they pay in taxes.
Marina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2012, 08:26 PM   #4
WindwalkerII
Presidential Member
 
WindwalkerII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,334
Default

There you go making sense again Calamity.
WindwalkerII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2012, 09:28 PM   #5
carswell
Platinum Member
 
carswell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 3,085
Default

I confess that's a thought that's crossed my mind more than once.

All these people complaining about their tax burdens and their inability to create jobs yet finding millions to pour into political advertising.

Something is desperately wrong with that picture.
carswell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2012, 09:43 PM   #6
Sal Monella
Elite Member
 
Sal Monella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Planet Claire
Posts: 13,319
Default

Excellent
Sal Monella is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 01:06 AM   #7
lawdawg
Silver Member
 
lawdawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 133
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Calamity Jane View Post
makes sense to me!


To start with we should not be debating raising the taxes on the 'rich' anyway!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-...b_1131020.html

http://www.american.com/archive/2011...taxingtherich/

That argument is, as they say, merely a distraction from the real issues and solutions. It's much like the Dems/Left whining about Romney's tax returns. It's fodder for the MSM, but it has nothing to do with solving this country's problems.

The us vs. rich argument is about Obama trying to get the have-not's [millions of whom pay no Federal Income taxes] to resent the haves [many of whom DO pay most of the Federal Income Taxes], and Obama's effort to avoid having to answer too many questions about HIS own record. That divisive effort is the exact opposite of what he promised to do when he ran for office!

Also, there are many jobs available that are going unfilled now, and many do not require college degrees! But, sometimes it's easier to harp that it's the wealthy who are keeping people down, or argue that the 'government' isn't doing enough to make people's life easier by providing more entitlements!


http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/28/bu...pagewanted=all

lawdawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 01:16 AM   #8
Koi
Elite Presidential Member
 
Koi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,339
Default

Oh, come on!
2001--tax cuts for the rich---the alleged "job creators."

Where are the %#$*^&%$ jobs!

They must have these tax cuts made permanent so more jobs can be created by the wealthy "job creators."

The GOP ran on "jobs, jobs, jobs" in 2010.
Where are the $%&*%^% jobs?

Give me an answer.

And I will demand to see Mitt Twitt's tax returns. The GOP demands women have no chocies with their bodies. I can demand some #$%^*% tax returns!

Where does one get the idea that any President is trying for class warfare. It's the knowing that a Presidential candidate uses tax loopholes and off-shore and foreign banking not to pay his FAIR share of taxes. Seems to me Mitt Twitt is the one creating class warfare!
Koi is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 10:28 AM   #9
Sal Monella
Elite Member
 
Sal Monella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Planet Claire
Posts: 13,319
Default

Cuts in personal income taxes don't create jobs. Except for cleaning people and gardners.
Sal Monella is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 11:20 AM   #10
Koi
Elite Presidential Member
 
Koi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 15,339
Default

If the rich do not create jobs, why does the GOP label them as "job creators"? Seems somebody is lying to somebody.
Koi is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2012, 01:58 PM   #11
ohhhhhhhhhm
Platinum Member
 
ohhhhhhhhhm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,438
Default

The rich would create more jobs if (a) they weren't living on capital gains, and (b) taxes on coporations were higher. Jobs get created when corporations are looking for ways to decrease their taxes.

Living on capital gains means that almost all the jobs being created are in offshore slave workers.
ohhhhhhhhhm is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Home Talk Entertainment Real Chat - Home Talk Entertainment- Terms of Service